Multi-channel support across phone, email, Teams and a self-service portal, from first to third line, all tracked in Jira Service Management against clear SLAs. But volume is the real tell: a great desk doesn’t just close tickets fast — it makes fewer of them happen. We hold ourselves to under 0.7 tickets per user per month, and the work of getting there is the programme.
People reach us however suits them — a call, an email, a message in Teams, or the portal — and land in one queue with one set of SLAs. First-line resolves the everyday; second and third line carry the complex work without re-explaining; and everything is logged, reportable and reviewed.
Phone, email, Microsoft Teams and a self-service portal — one front door, one ticketing system, one SLA framework behind all of them.
Coverage spanning Microsoft 365, identity, devices, collaboration and voice, remote access, file access and permissions, and joiner / mover / leaver workflows.
Structured problem management means recurring issues get fixed at source. The deliverables: SLA and CSAT/NPS reports, root-cause analysis, and a governance dashboard.
Most desks report on how fast they close tickets. That measures the symptom. The number that measures the system is how many tickets happen in the first place. Run above 0.7 per user per month and you are paying for inefficiency and frustrating your users at the same time. Driving it down — from 0.7 to 0.68 — is twenty-five different things on a matrix we manage, and working that matrix is the service.
A modern, well-run estate generates fewer tickets: devices build themselves, identity just works, and automation closes the routine before a person is involved. So ticket volume per user is really a proxy for how modern and well-governed the whole environment is — which is why we anchor the conversation on it, and trend it every month against tech-services spend as a percentage of revenue.
Every priority has a defined response and resolution target, reported monthly. These are the standards we run our managed estate to.
| Priority | Description | Resolution target | Attainment |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Major impact | ≤ 4 hours | 90% |
| P2 | Serious impact | ≤ 8 hours | 90% |
| P3 | Limited impact | ≤ 2 service days | 80% |
| P4 | Minor impact | ≤ 3 service days | 80% |
| Critical request | e.g. password reset | ≤ 1 hour | 90% |
| New starters | Onboarding provisioning | ≤ 5 service days | 90% |
90% of calls answered within 40 seconds, with under 5% dropped after that. A real person, quickly.
Around 40% of P3/P4 issues resolved on first contact — no callback, no queue, no handoff.
Office 365, email, internet, file servers, AD and WAN held at 98% availability during core hours.
A TCO review benchmarks your current ticket volume, channel mix and SLAs against a modern operation — and shows where the noise is coming from.